Real, but the surviving record is thin or comes from one period only.
Reret rrt
the hippopotamus who holds the Great Bear on a chain
The figure, plainly
The hippopotamus who holds the Great Bear on a chain
A retelling, not a translation. What follows is the story as it is commonly told, drawn together from the better popular and scholarly accounts. It is not keyed to any single ancient text, and the ancient sources rarely agree with each other as neatly as a retelling has to. The attested record — with its sources, its gaps, and its disagreements — is below.
Go outside tonight, north of the tropics, and find the Big Dipper. Seven bright stars, unmistakable, and they never set — they wheel around the pole all night, every night, and never dip below the horizon.
The Egyptians looked at those seven stars and saw Set: the god of storm and violence and the desert, the one who murdered his brother. They called the shape the Thigh, after the foreleg of an ox.
And they needed something to hold him there.
The chain
The account is short and does not hedge:
The chief opponent of Set was the hippopotamus goddess Reret, who was believed to keep this power of darkness securely fettered by a chain.
She stands beside the Thigh, holding the chain that keeps it in place.
What I find remarkable is that this is a piece of theology you can verify. The Great Bear never sets. It is up there all night, circling, going nowhere. If your story is that a goddess has that constellation on a chain, the sky agrees with you every single night for your entire life.
Egyptian religion runs on maintenance — the sun has to be rowed through the night, the serpent has to be fought again tomorrow, order has to be re-established constantly and never stays established. Here is the same logic, put where anybody can check it.
Why the north is the bad direction
The geography behind this is worth spelling out, because it is not obvious to anyone living in Europe or North America.
Stand in Upper Egypt — the southern valley — and look north. That is where the cold comes from. The mist, the rain, the darkness. Everything unwelcome arrives from the north, and every one of those is an attribute of Set.
So the northern sky is his natural domain, and the constellation that owns the northern sky is his constellation. It is not an arbitrary assignment. It is someone describing the weather.
(The source goes on to note that the Hebrews called the region of darkness Sephon, and connects it to Saphon, north — a comparative claim offered without evidence, and recorded here as his rather than as fact.)
A hippopotamus with hands
The image is specific and slightly alarming:
the arms and hands of a woman attached to the body of a hippopotamus, and in each hand a knife.
If you know Egyptian art you are already thinking of Taweret — the upright pregnant hippopotamus who protects women in childbirth, one of the most beloved figures in the whole tradition, found in houses rather than temples.
These two are not obviously distinguishable in the sources read here, and the honest position is that this reference does not yet know what separates them. Two upright hippopotamus goddesses, both armed, both protective, both in the northern sky. Somebody in Egypt knew the difference.
Her temple was called Het-Khaat. That is all that is said about it.
She is not only a jailer
Her job is given as two things, and the second is easy to skim past.
She keeps Set restrained. And she makes clear a way in the sky for the birth of Heru-sma-taui — a form of Horus that one nineteenth-century scholar identified with the spring sun.
So she is not just holding the door shut on something bad. She is holding the northern darkness still so that something can be born in the sky. A jailer and a midwife, and the two jobs are the same job: the light cannot arrive until the dark is pinned down.
That is a better piece of theology than most of what gets quoted from this material.
And then the source takes it all back
Immediately after describing her distinctive body, her two knives, her temple and her two duties, the same paragraph adds:
the texts, however, make it clear that Reret was nothing but a form of Isis.
No texts are cited. No attempt is made to square it with the hippopotamus, the knives, or the chain.
I have left both statements standing, because that is what the page is for. The best source available says two incompatible things about her in consecutive sentences and does not choose between them, and reporting only the tidier half would be a kind of lying.
She may well be Isis in the north with a chain in her hand. She may be an old independent goddess who got absorbed the way half the goddesses in this reference got absorbed. What is certain is that somebody stood outside, looked up at seven stars that never set, and decided the reason they never go anywhere is that a hippopotamus is holding them.
Overview
The Egyptians looked at the Great Bear and saw Set, and they needed something to hold him there.
The chief opponent of Set was the hippopotamus goddess Reret, who was believed to keep this power of darkness securely fettered by a chain. [budge-1904]
The constellation is called the Thigh in Egyptian, and the seven stars are Set's. Reret stands beside them holding the chain. This is a piece of theology you can go outside and check: the Great Bear never sets, so the restraint is visibly permanent and visibly nightly — the same maintenance logic the Am-Tuat runs on, transposed to the sky.
Why the north
Budge sets out the reasoning, and it is geographical before it is theological:
the northern sky was the natural domain of Set, for viewed from the standpoint of an Egyptian in Upper Egypt the north was rightly considered to be the place of darkness, cold, mist, and rain, each of which was an attribute of Set. [budge-1904]
He adds that the Hebrews called the region of darkness Sephon, "a name which appears to be connected beyond a doubt with Saphon, 'North'" — a comparative claim of his own, offered without evidence and recorded here as his.
What she looks like, and what she does
this goddess is usually represented with the arms and hands of a woman which are attached to the body of a hippopotamus, and in each she holds a knife. Her temple was called Het-Khaat. [budge-1904]
A hippopotamus with human arms and a knife in each hand. Compare taweret, the other upright hippopotamus goddess — the entries should eventually say what distinguishes them, because the sources here do not.
Her duty is stated as two things, and the second is easy to miss:
The duty of the goddess was to keep in restraint the evil influence of Set and to make clear a way in the sky for the birth of Heru-sma-taui, whom Dr. Brugsch identified with the spring sun. [budge-1904]
So she is not only a jailer. She is a midwife to a sunrise — holding the northern darkness still so that something can be born in the sky. The Brugsch identification with the spring sun is attributed and not endorsed.
Budge's own caveat, kept
Immediately after the above, Budge undercuts the whole entry:
the texts, however, make it clear that Reret was nothing but a form of Isis. [budge-1904]
He does not cite the texts, and he does not reconcile the claim with the distinctive iconography he has just described. Both statements are left standing here, because the corpus's job is to report that its best available source says two things and does not choose between them.
The four sons, behind the Thigh
From BD xvii. 89, Budge reports that Set was accompanied by the four children of Horus — Mestha, Hapi, Tuamutef and Qebhsennuf — who were "behind the Thigh in the northern sky" and "believed to take part in curbing the evil deeds of Set." He suggests identifying them with the four Af gods [budge-1904].
This places the four sons of Horus in the sky as well as in the canopic jars, working the same job as Reret.
An unsupported comparative theory, recorded as such
Budge reports a proposal that several Egyptian gods were worshipped as idols by pre-Islamic Arabs, in which Reret = Lat (al-Lāt), alongside Tem = Tim, Thoth = Ta'ut, Bes = Buss, Bennu = Bewanat, Bar = Ba'al. He credits it to Ahmed-Bey Kamal and calls the theory "of interest, but…" — the sentence continues past the excerpt read here [budge-1904].
Recorded because it exists in the source, not because it holds. Sound-alike equations across language families are exactly the kind of claim this corpus grades down.
The record
Every claim above traces to a row here. Source, exact place in that source, and what it actually supports.
| Source | Locus | Attests |
|---|---|---|
[budge-1904] | *Gods of the Egyptians* II, on Set and the northern sky | **Reret** as "the chief opponent of Set," keeping him "securely fettered by a chain"; the seven stars of the Great Bear |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.* | the north as "the place of darkness, cold, mist, and rain," Set's domain; the Sephon/Saphon comparison (Budge's own) |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.* | iconography — a hippopotamus body with a woman's arms, **a knife in each hand**; her temple **Het-Khaat** |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.* | her two duties: restraining Set, and clearing the way for the birth of **Heru-sma-taui** (Brugsch: the spring sun) |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.* | "the texts, however, make it clear that Reret was nothing but a form of **Isis**" |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.*, citing **BD xvii. 89** | the four children of Horus "behind the Thigh in the northern sky," curbing Set; possibly the four **Af** gods |
[budge-1904] | *ibid.*, citing Ahmed-Bey Kamal | the pre-Islamic Arab idol theory, **Reret = Lat** |
Sources
[budge-1904]— Budge, The Gods of the Egyptians (1904), vol. II, on Set and the northern sky. Public domain, archived insources-texts/. Budge cites Brugsch, Geographie, p. 954 and Ahmed-Bey Kamal, Les Idoles Arabes et les Divinités Égyptiennes (Recueil xxiv, p. 11 ff.), neither archived here.- Note: the single occurrence of reret in the Papyrus of Ani is not this goddess — it is the ordinary verb, "arrange for me the ways" [budge-1895]. Four of the five archived hits are the goddess; one is vocabulary.
Open questions
- Reret vs taweret. Two upright hippopotamus goddesses with overlapping protective functions. The sources archived here do not distinguish them, and the entries should not pretend to.
- Which texts make Reret "nothing but a form of Isis"? Budge asserts it without citation, immediately after describing iconography that is not Isis's.
- Het-Khaat — named once as her temple and never located. Find it.
- Read BD xvii. 89 directly for the four sons "behind the Thigh."
- Heru-sma-taui — the birth she clears the way for. Is he in the census? Brugsch's spring-sun identification needs testing.
- The Ahmed-Bey Kamal theory: get the Recueil article and Budge's full sentence, which is cut off in the excerpt read here.
- Establish an actual date for her cult. Nothing above is dated, which is why this entry is ◐ and not ●.
Cite this entry
Research grade: ◐partial — Genuinely attested, but the record is thin or single-period.
"Reret", The Egyptian God Corpus,
graded partial, retrieved 2026-08-10.