The Egyptian God Corpus
●fullOld Kingdomc. 2686–2181 BCE

Well documented. Several independent sources across different periods. In the record from the very beginning.

Atum jtm / tm

the one who finishes

Also known as
Tem, Temu, Tum, Atem (Budge-era forms); Ⲁⲧⲟⲩⲙ (Coptic). Female counterpart Temt
Domains
the evening sun, completion, self-creation, the first being, Heliopolis
Cult centres
Annu / Heliopolis — head of the Great Company. Also Per-Atem (Pithom), capital of Theket, the eighth nome of Lower Egypt
Iconography
a man, always — usually wearing the Double Crown. No animal head
Atum — new art
New art Drawn for this reference from the attested iconography above. Not an ancient image.

The myth, retold

The story as it is told

A retelling, not a translation. What follows is the story as it is commonly told, drawn together from the better popular and scholarly accounts. It is not keyed to any single ancient text, and the ancient sources rarely agree with each other as neatly as a retelling has to. The attested record — with its sources, its gaps, and its disagreements — is below.

The god at the beginning of everything is named after endings.

That is not a mistranslation. Atum — Tem, in the older books — comes from a root meaning to be complete, to make an end of. Budge reads him straightforwardly as the evening sun, the form the sun takes when the day is finishing.

So Egypt's first being, the one who exists when nothing else does, is the sunset. I have never got entirely used to that.

Alone, with nowhere to stand

The creation account puts it in the first person, and it is one of the loneliest things in ancient literature.

Nothing existed at that time, and it was I who made whatsoever was made. I was alone, and there was no other being who worked with me in that place.

And then the detail that makes it real:

I found there no place wherein I could stand.

Think about the problem being described. He exists, in Nu — the dark, inert, limitless water that precedes the world. There is no ground. There is no direction. There is no here. Before he can make anything he has to solve the prior problem of location, and the text says he does it by working a spell on his own heart and laying a foundation in front of himself.

He invents somewhere to stand. Then he starts.

One became three

What he does next is stated as arithmetic rather than poetry:

It was I who emitted Shu, and it was I who emitted Tefnut, and from being one god I became three.

Two children, and the count goes from one to three. Not one plus two equals three — from being one god I became three. He is not a father who now has a family. He is a single thing that is now three things and did not shrink in the process.

Everything downstream is expansion of that first split. Shu and Tefnut produce Geb and Nut, earth and sky. Geb and Nut produce Osiris, Isis, Set and Nephthys. Nine gods, the Great Company of Heliopolis — and the entire enormous structure is one god dividing, then dividing again.

The part nobody wants to translate

Here is how he does it, in the oldest version, written in the pyramid of Pepi I around 2300 BCE: he masturbates.

The text says so. Budge says so — while calling the myth crude, wondering aloud about "semi-savage" origins, and generally telling you a great deal about Edwardian England and not much about Egypt.

Because there is nothing confused about it. The problem the priests of Heliopolis had was genuinely hard: how does one thing become two when there is no second thing to help? Sexual reproduction is the obvious model for making new beings, and it requires a partner, and there is no partner. So they used the one form of generation that a solitary being can actually perform. It is not crude. It is rigorous.

What is interesting is that Egypt got uncomfortable later. In time you find the suggestion that his shadow served as his wife. Then a goddess called Iusaaset appears in the role. A god who was originally alone — emphatically, structurally alone, because the whole argument depends on it — gets quietly issued a consort by embarrassed successors.

The retrofit is the tell. Somebody, centuries on, felt what Budge felt.

He is always a man

Egyptian religion is full of animal heads. Falcons, jackals, ibises, cows, crocodiles, an entire beetle where a face should be.

Atum never gets one. Budge notes it in passing — "he is always depicted in the human form" — and it slips by, but it is doing real work.

Every animal-headed god is a god of something in the world. The falcon is the sky and the hunt; the jackal is the desert cemetery where jackals actually dig. The animal is the evidence. Atum has no animal because he precedes the world the animals live in. There is nothing available to compare him to. So he is drawn as a man in the Double Crown, and the plainness is the point.

Twelve seconds of existence

My favourite Atum passage is small and easy to miss.

In the eleventh hour of the night, in the Book of Gates, there is a winged serpent. Ra addresses it, and while he is speaking a god springs out of the serpent's back and stands beside it. The god is Atum. The moment Ra stops speaking, he vanishes back inside.

He exists for the length of a sentence.

I find that a strangely honest image of what a god is in this system. Not a permanent person residing somewhere, but something that comes into being when it is invoked and goes when the invocation ends. The god of completion, appearing for the duration of a speech and then completing.

The circle closes

Put the day together and you can see what the Egyptians were actually saying.

Dawn is Khepri, whose name means to come into being. Noon is Ra. Evening is Atum, whose name means to be finished.

But Atum is also the creator, the one at the start, before anything. So the god who ends the day is the god who begins the world.

Which means the day does not run from a beginning to an end. It runs from a beginning to an end that is the beginning. There is a Pyramid Text that names a god Tem-kheprer — completion-and-becoming, both words in one name, written down four thousand three hundred years ago.

They had noticed. They wrote it as a name and moved on.

Overview

Atum is the god the Egyptians put at the beginning, and his name means approximately to be finished.

That is the first strange thing about him, and it is not a translation error. Budge derives the name from the root tem or temem, "to be complete, to make an end of," and reads the god accordingly as "the form of the Sun-god which brought the day to an end, i.e., as the evening or night sun" [budge-1904].

So the deity who exists before anything else is named for endings. Egypt's creator is its sunset.

He is also, uniquely among the major gods, never given an animal head. Budge notes flatly that "he is always depicted in the human form" [budge-1904]. In a religion of falcons, jackals, cows, beetles and cobras, the first being is a man in a crown.

Attestation history

Old Kingdom. Tem appears in Budge's roster of gods named in the Pyramid Texts at Unas 207, with the compound form Tem-kheprer at Pepi II 662 [budge-1904]. He heads the Great Company of Heliopolis in the paut lists: the Unas litany at line 240 begins "Tem, Shu, Tefnut, Seb, Nut, Isis, Set, Nephthys, Thoth, and Horus," and the twelve-god version at Pepi II 669 begins with him likewise [budge-1904].

Maspero's explanation of why these lists vary is worth recording: "The number nine was the original number, but each of the nine gods, especially the first and the last, could be developed" — and when Thebes wanted Amun in the Heliopolitan company, he "could be set at the head of it either in the place of Temu, the legitimate chief of the paut, or side by side with him" [budge-1904]. Atum's position is the one other cities had to negotiate with.

The oldest origin story. Budge is specific about where the myth of the first generation is written down: "The oldest legend about the origin of the gods is contained in the text of Pepi I., wherein it is said (line 465) that once upon a time Tem went to the city of Annu and that he there produced from his own body by the irregular means of masturbation his two children Shu and Tefnut" [budge-1904].

The creation narrative. Budge translates a first-person account in which the god sets out the whole sequence:

I came into being from primeval matter, and I appeared under the form of multitudes of things from the beginning. Nothing existed at that time, and it was I who made whatsoever was made. I was alone, and there was no other being who worked with me in that place. [budge-1904]

and then:

I found there no place wherein I could stand. I worked a spell on my heart, and I laid a foundation before me… It was I who emitted Shu, and it was I who emitted Tefnut, and from being one god I became three. [budge-1904]

Later — the Book of Gates. In the eleventh hour a winged serpent is addressed by Ra, and Budge describes what happens: "The god who stands by the winged serpent is Temu, who springs out of the reptile's back when Ra addresses it; but as soon as the words cease Temu disappears into the serpent" [budge-1904]. He exists for exactly the duration of the speech.

Geography. Budge's Lower Egyptian nome list gives the eighth nome as Theket (Succoth), capital Per-Atem (Pithom), deity Atem [budge-1904] — the Egyptian name behind the Pithom of Exodus i. 11.

What the texts say

"From being one god I became three." This is the cleanest statement of plurality-from-unity in the corpus, and it is arithmetic, not metaphor. One becomes three by emitting two. Everything after — nine gods, twelve gods, the whole Ennead — is expansion of that first division.

Creation is an act of the body, and Egypt did not tidy it up for long. The Pepi I text says masturbation. Budge, writing in 1904, calls the myth "crude" and speculates about "semi-savage" origins, which is his period speaking rather than the evidence. What the evidence actually shows is discomfort later: Budge records that Egyptians eventually "assumed that his shadow, khaibit, acted the part of wife to him," or that the goddess Iusaaset was his wife [budge-1904] — and elsewhere he records two female counterparts attached to Tem, Iusaaset and Nebt-Hetep, both in the company of Heliopolis. A consort was retrofitted onto a god who originally had none, and apparently more than once.

Completion and becoming are the same god's two ends. Tem is "to finish"; ḫpr is "to come into being." Morning is Khepri, noon is Ra, evening is Atum. The compound Tem-kheprer at Pepi II 662 puts both words in one name.

There is a further implication the texts do not spell out but the etymology carries: if tem means completion, then the god of the first moment and the god of the last are the same, and the day is a closed circuit rather than a line.

Iconography

A man. Bearded, human-headed, generally in the Double Crown of Upper and Lower Egypt — which reads as a claim of rule over the whole country rather than a nature-symbol.

He carries the was sceptre and ankh. In the solar barque he appears as the evening form. In the Book of Gates eleventh hour he is the figure emerging from the winged serpent's back.

The absence of an animal form is the iconographic argument: this god is not of anything in the world, because he precedes the world.

Cult and practice

Annu / Heliopolis is his city and the seat of the Great Company. His priests held the theological initiative that other centres — Memphis, Thebes — had to answer, absorb, or overwrite.

Per-Atem / Pithom in the eastern Delta carried his name into a second tradition entirely; it is one of the two store-cities of Exodus i. 11.

In funerary practice he is addressed directly for breath: the deceased says "Hail, thou god Tem, grant unto me the sweet breath which dwelleth in thy nostrils" [budge-1904].

See also the Eighth Division — Tem sits in the sealed Circle Sesheta with Khepera and Shu, on a weaving loom, and the souls inside are heard from outside "like the hum of many bees of honey."


The record

Every claim above traces to a row here. Source, exact place in that source, and what it actually supports.

SourceLocusAttests
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, Pyramid Texts god-list, Unas 207Tem among the gods of the Pyramid Texts
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, Pyramid Texts god-list, Pepi II 662the compound form Tem-kheprer
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, citing Pepi I l. 465the oldest origin-of-the-gods legend: Tem at Annu produces Shu and Tefnut from his own body
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, Unas l. 240 ff. and Pepi II l. 669Tem heading the Great Company in both the ten-god and twelve-god lists
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, ch. on the Creation"It was I who emitted Shu, and it was I who emitted Tefnut, and from being one god I became three"
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, Book of Gates, eleventh hourTemu springing from the winged serpent's back for the duration of Ra's speech
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* I, Lower Egyptian nome list, nome 8Theket (Succoth), capital Per-Atem (Pithom), deity Atem
[budge-1904]*Gods of the Egyptians* II, Great Company sectionthe etymology *tem* / *temem*, "to be complete, to make an end of"; always human in form

Sources

  • [budge-1904] — Budge, The Gods of the Egyptians (1904), vols I–II. Public domain, archived in sources-texts/. Budge caveat applies (04-BIBLIOGRAPHY.md). The Pyramid Text line numbers and the nome list are transcription and are the reliable part; the etymology and the translated creation monologue are interpretation — see open threads.
  • [sethe-1908] — Sethe, Die altägyptischen Pyramidentexte (1908–22). Public domain. Verify Unas 207, Pepi I 465 and Pepi II 662 against it.
  • [wilkinson-2003] — Wilkinson, The Complete Gods and Goddesses. In copyright; cited only.

Open questions

  • Identify the manuscript behind the creation monologue. Budge prints it in his Creation chapter without a clean citation in the passage itself; it is very probably the Bremner–Rhind papyrus (papyrus of Nesi-Amsu), which is Late Period, not Old Kingdom. If so, the famous "I became three" line is roughly two thousand years younger than Pepi I 465, and this entry must say so explicitly. Resolve before this line is quoted anywhere else.
  • Verify the tem / temem etymology against a modern lexicon. It is repeated everywhere and rests here on Budge alone.
  • Check Pepi I 465 against Sethe and against a modern translation (Allen or Faulkner); Budge's paraphrase is doing a great deal of work.
  • Iusaaset is now written (2026-07-29), and Budge records a second consort alongside her — Nebt-Hetep, who has no entry. Two consorts supplied to a god whose defining feature was having none suggests the fix was applied more than once. Dating the first appearance is still open, and is still the interesting question.
  • Get an excavation reference for Tell el-Maskhuta / Pithom and its identification with Per-Atem.
  • The Book of Gates eleventh-hour scene needs a plate reference.

Cite this entry

Research grade: ●full — Multiple attestations across periods.

"Atum", The Egyptian God Corpus, graded full, retrieved 2026-08-10.